On the instuments of time and the location factor
I was just remembering something because yesterday was November 5, 2025, and November 5, 1955 was in Back to the Future.
So it has been, errrmmmm, okay, like 40 years. I counted 40 hours yesterday a few times to calculate when I could eat again.
Anyway, I was unclear in my last blog as to whether or not the ideas associated with the old way of astrology was bad for its content or it's uses. It was bad for its content. The master of the old times was looking at the way the world operated with its eyes on the elements of our universe, which are incidentals. We can and do set up things according to the previously important features, but with life being complete, it is sometimes taken for its pieces and that sets humans on different courses. This is evident by the way some cultures reach certain achievements before others.
So if a box has a cat inside, one may be alive and one may be dead. The fact that Venus sees it or does not is not the ultimate factor. It is Venus who is always seeing, but not Fred or Aldfrith, or Job.
These too are important figures. However, the auspices should be seen less as incidentals and more as co-conspiritors.
I am looking today at the stars and thinking a lot of time as it is, and seemed to reveal itself while I was reading these things, as a location and not a line, since it is linear to us but we will reconsider these things based on logical facts. If Venus is an incidentals and the achievements of things take varying course, then each thing must be considered in constant with the elements of what is. What is is permanent, and that seems to be the comforting fact of science.
What isn't is the development and movement, which has a coordinate we call time. I was inspired to thinglk of time like this by those who have the ability to travel it in directions outside our experience. As life "just exists" because we believe what we are told from God, so time is flexible in the hereafter. What we see in Ezekial is a creature darting with wheels, which are circles, and that made me believe that time is a matter of movement.
Its all very beautiful. But it is not controlled by things that are static. Static is very unscientific, and that in a way is a new paradox for today!


Comments
Post a Comment